Nicolas Tepmahc vs Bora Sengul Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 02 Jul at 07:50 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
N. Tepmahc vs B. Sengul

FRA
1
Win
Played
0
Win

TUR
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Tepmahc 1 - 0 Sengul
They have played 2 sets in total, with Nicolas Tepmahc winning 2 and Bora Sengul winning 0. The last match between Nicolas Tepmahc and Bora Sengul was at the M15 Kayseri, 02-07-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Nicolas Tepmahc getting the victory 7-5 7-6(2).
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Tepmahc | 1 |
| Sengul | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) M15 Kayseri(07-02-25)
N. Tepmahc vs B. Sengul H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 52.29% (171-156) | Career Total W/L | 50.51% (50-49) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
N. Tepmahc vs B. Sengul Match Preview:
- Second Serve Performance: Tepmahc has outperformed Sengul in recent form, winning 39.88% of points on their second serve compared to Sengul's 35.42%. How significant could this advantage be? Given its strong correlation with match outcomes, it may give Tepmahc a slight edge.
- Return Game: Tepmahc excels in returning, especially against first serves, with a 29.45% success rate compared to Sengul’s 25.39%. However, Sengul is stronger against opponents’ second serves, winning 49.03% of points compared to Tepmahc's 45.63%. How crucial is returning? It often dictates control in matches, making these stats vital.
- Under Pressure: Tepmahc slightly leads in saving breakpoints with 51.15% to Sengul’s 49.48%. This could be a pivotal factor when evaluating who handles pressure better.
- Match Success Rate: Over the past year, Tepmahc has a higher win rate of 60.78% versus Sengul’s 54.29%. Is this indicative of overall form? It may suggest Tepmahc is generally more consistent in matches.
- Surface Performance: Tepmahc prefers Hard courts with a 56% win rate, whereas Sengul is more successful on Clay, holding a 53% win record. Could surface preference impact match outcomes? Yes, it often plays a critical role.
- Opponent Quality: Tepmahc has played against higher-ranked opponents on average, indicating potential exposure to tougher competition.
- Deciding Sets: Sengul shows resilience in deciding sets, winning 100% of them, whereas Tepmahc has won 60%. Could this be vital in close matches? Likely, as it hints at Sengul's grit in critical moments.
- Break Point Conversion: Tepmahc converts more breakpoint opportunities at 40.87%, compared to Sengul’s 30%. This can be decisive in turning games around during a match.
Editorial Prediction (July 2, 2025, UTC):
In analyzing the match between Tepmahc and Sengul, several key factors emerge that give insight into potential outcomes.
Tepmahc shows a slight edge in second serve performance and overall match win consistency over the past year. Additionally, their ability to convert breakpoints frequently and face higher-ranked opponents suggests a level of experience that could be advantageous. Their preference for Hard courts might also give them a boost if the match is on this surface.
Sengul, however, demonstrates exceptional resilience in deciding sets and shows strong return stats against second serves. If the match is played on Clay, Sengul could have an advantage given their better record on this surface.
Overall, considering the balance of these factors, Tepmahc appears to have a slightly stronger overall profile for this specific match-up, making them the likely favorite to win.
Nicolas Tepmahc vs Bora Sengul Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
N. Tepmahc vs B. Sengul H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 14 | Games Won | 11 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 2:12:11 | Average Match Time | 2:12:11 |
| 60% (53/89) | 1st Serve % | 79% (53/67) |
| 64% (34/53) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (32/53) |
| 69% (25/36) | 2nd Serve Win % | 64% (9/14) |
| 100% (3/3) | Break Pts Won % | 29% (2/7) |
| 39% (26/67) | Return Points Win % | 34% (30/89) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
N. Tepmahc Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 | L | 4-2 ret. | ||
R1 | W | 6-3 7-6(4) | ||
R2 | L | 7-6(7) 6-3 | ||
R1 | W | 6-4 6-2 | ||
R1 | L | 6-4 3-6 6-4 | ||
B. Sengul Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 6-4 6-2 | ||
R1 | L | 6-3 6-7(6) 6-3 | ||
Q1 | L | 6-1 6-3 | ||
R1 | L | 7-5 7-6(2) | ||
Q1 | L | 7-5 7-6(6) | ||

N. Tepmahc vs B. Sengul Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 52.29% (171/156) | YTD Win/Loss | 50.51% (50/49) |
| 52.84% (381/340) | Sets Win/Loss | 49.53% (105/107) |
| 51.23% (3385/3222) | Games Win/Loss | 51.10% (1025/981) |
| 55.70% (127/101) | Hard Win/Loss | 40.91% (9/13) |
| 42.59% (23/31) | Clay Win/Loss | 53.25% (41/36) |
| 46.67% (21/24) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.11 | Aces Per Game | 0.07 |
| 366 | Aces Total | 71 |
| 0.13 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.13 |
| 418 | Total Double Faults | 131 |
| 1:18:12 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 396.16 | Average Opponent Rank | 251.1 |
| 63% (10678/16885) | 1st Serve % | 67% (2264/3386) |
| 63% (6742/10678) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (1388/2264) |
| 48% (2966/6207) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (480/1122) |
| 47% (873/1850) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 38% (127/330) |
| 43% (7232/16904) | Return Points Win % | 38% (1278/3320) |
| 12.50% (1/7) | Challenger W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 53.29% (170/149) | Futures W/L | 51.02% (50/48) |
| 53% (166/315) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (49/98) |
| 0% (0/3) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 51% (31/61) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 59% (10/17) |
| 44% (32/72) | Deciding Set Win % | 60% (9/15) |
| 88% (173/152) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 94% (49/46) |
| 12% (173/20) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 6% (49/3) |
| 12% (154/18) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 8% (50/4) |